Should the government charge a tax for emails since the postal service is losing money because of emails?

Would you continue to use email if they taxed it a penny for every email sent?Should the government charge a tax for emails since the postal service is losing money because of emails?
How is the postal service losing money if people send emails? It imposes no cost burden on them. People send hundreds of emails a year, virtually nobody sent that many letters, it's not lost business. First class mail was never their profit maker, it's junk mail. As for a tax on emails, what a nightmare. What constitutes an email? Would text messages be considered email? What if I download a post from a website? It would be an absurd imposition and little more than an effort to shutdown modern technology. People who seriously push such a proposition should be stripped of all technological advances since the 1980s.
The government is already taxing everything else. It wouldn't surprise me if they try. I would just stop sending emails.Should the government charge a tax for emails since the postal service is losing money because of emails?
They've already tried this, many times. It is called disruptive technology, and is no reason to tax letters. That really would be ridiculous--hope no one takes it seriously.
nope, we have to keep the Government out of the Internet as much as possible..........!



even though they are reading this as i speak~!!!Should the government charge a tax for emails since the postal service is losing money because of emails?
So far this tax is buried in internet subscription payments.
no..they should charge more for users of post office. besides we pay enough tax to justify the podst service.
DAMMIT SHUT THE F@@@ UP!!!!!! Don't give them any ideas.
Please don't give them any ideas!
No
no



and yes

smokey bones

disneymovieclub